The council, after thought of all feelings communicated by Internet Neutrality defenders and system administrators, feels that here is a great amount of inherent outcomes in planning levy arrangements, and it would not be conceivable to either pre-consider all potential outcomes or decide its legitimacy concerning Internet Neutrality standards. The board of trustees is of the assessment that a conclusion on whether the tax arranges particularly break Internet Neutrality would need to be found in the setting of the outline of the levy arrangement and the results it produced, including its capacity to bend customer markets. Consequently, the Committee suggests that levy arrangements be managed in taking after ways-
Ex-stake measurement: Before a licensee dispatches any duty arrange, the same would be documented before TRAI inside of a sensible period preceding the dispatch of the arrangement. TRAI would look at each such tax recording deliberately to check whether fits in with the standards of Internet Neutrality standards and that it is not against aggressive by contorting buyer markets. Such a recording prerequisite will incorporate an esteemed endorsement provision if the controller does not choose inside of a sensible period. It would guarantee equalization of intrigues securing the freedom of TSPs/ISPs to particular outline levy arranges sensitive to particular client requests and in the meantime guarantee that the standards of Internet Neutrality are not ruptured.
Ex-post control: Complaints on levy arrangements might be managed on a case by case premise through an adjudicatory procedure to be indicated by the controller and after giving a sensible chance of being listened. The burden of punishments or budgetary disincentives could be considered if the standards of Internet Neutrality are abused. Be that as it may, the estimation standards are to be characterized to estimate whether the levy arranges encroach on Internet Neutrality standards.